This week I read the article, “A Child’s Response to
Intervention Requires a Responsive Teacher of Reading”. IDEA offers U.S. schools confronting rising
enrollments of students with learning disabilities two options for individuals
with disabilities. The first option is that local education agencies can use as
much as 15% of their special education funds to pay for early intervening services
and to support professional development and literacy instruction. Second,
offered by IDEA response to Intervention that can be used to provide early
interventions with labeling students at risk for school failure as learning
disabled. The article then goes into the
fundamental principles of the RTI Model. The main principles are ensuring identification
of a struggling child, provide effective intervening services, and monitor the
child.
Overall, it is pretty evident that a struggling child needs
an expert teacher. A teacher needs to be
trained and know how to work with children who are lower-performing learners. Given
the federal requirement for evidence-based interventions, the most reliable
source for teachers, administrators, researchers, and policymakers seeking effective
reading interventions is the What Works. TheWWC’s mission is to provide “a
central and trusted source of scientific evidence of what works in education.”
The article offered some good information on RTI and the requirements of a
teacher who is teaching a struggling student.
I found this article to be very informative. I agree that a low-performing learner needs an expert teacher and that having a teacher who had quality training can make a big difference for struggling readers!
ReplyDelete